White HouseSenateThe HouseSupreme CourtFederal ReserveDOJState DepartmentTreasuryCensusBudget OfficeTrade Representative
WashingTone
Informed by Washington, Defined by Insight
Sunday, May 18, 2025
WashingTone
House Oversight Committee Chair Raises Concerns Over Comey's Social Media Post
James Comer suggests potential implications of former FBI director's Instagram post amidst GOP criticism.
James Comer, the House Oversight Committee chair and Republican representative from Kentucky, has made headlines following comments about former FBI director James Comey during a Fox News interview.
Comer suggested that Comey’s recently deleted social media post, which featured seashells on a beach spelling out '86 47,' might have been an attempt to incite a coup or insurrection against former President Donald Trump.
This statement comes amid heightened tensions within GOP ranks over Trump's recent successes related to border security.
In the interview with former representative Jason Chaffetz, now a Fox News personality, Comer expressed that Comey’s actions seemed indicative of anxiety among those opposed to Trump’s agenda.
He stated, 'Look they’re losing their minds over Trump’s success in securing the border, and all the things the media said President Trump couldn’t do that he did in the first three weeks of his term.'
Following the uproar from GOP leaders over Comey’s Instagram post, the Secret Service conducted a voluntary interview with Comey at their Washington Field Office.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed Comey's cooperation on the social media platform X, indicating the seriousness of the situation.
Comey, 64, has publicly denied any intention to signify violence, including a call for Trump's assassination, clarifying in a subsequent statement that he did not realize the numbers '86 47' could be associated with violence.
He emphasized, 'It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind so I took down the post.' The term '86' is commonly understood in various contexts as slang for rejecting or eliminating something.
Comer also reflected on his perception of Comey, stating, 'My opinion of the former FBI chief is so bad that I didn’t know what to make of the intent behind Comey’s post.' He criticized Comey's past actions, claiming they were marked by errors and dishonesty.
This incident has sparked significant discussion within political circles regarding the implications of social media communications by public figures and their potential interpretations.
Comer suggested that Comey’s recently deleted social media post, which featured seashells on a beach spelling out '86 47,' might have been an attempt to incite a coup or insurrection against former President Donald Trump.
This statement comes amid heightened tensions within GOP ranks over Trump's recent successes related to border security.
In the interview with former representative Jason Chaffetz, now a Fox News personality, Comer expressed that Comey’s actions seemed indicative of anxiety among those opposed to Trump’s agenda.
He stated, 'Look they’re losing their minds over Trump’s success in securing the border, and all the things the media said President Trump couldn’t do that he did in the first three weeks of his term.'
Following the uproar from GOP leaders over Comey’s Instagram post, the Secret Service conducted a voluntary interview with Comey at their Washington Field Office.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed Comey's cooperation on the social media platform X, indicating the seriousness of the situation.
Comey, 64, has publicly denied any intention to signify violence, including a call for Trump's assassination, clarifying in a subsequent statement that he did not realize the numbers '86 47' could be associated with violence.
He emphasized, 'It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind so I took down the post.' The term '86' is commonly understood in various contexts as slang for rejecting or eliminating something.
Comer also reflected on his perception of Comey, stating, 'My opinion of the former FBI chief is so bad that I didn’t know what to make of the intent behind Comey’s post.' He criticized Comey's past actions, claiming they were marked by errors and dishonesty.
This incident has sparked significant discussion within political circles regarding the implications of social media communications by public figures and their potential interpretations.
